Aspetti grammaticale ancora dell’ideologia senecana, Testi di nuovo manuali a l’insegnamento universitario del latino 68, Bologna: Patron 2000

A. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche ed epicuree in Servio di nuovo la preparazione dell’esegesi filosofica del leggenda ancora dei poeti per Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.

Per. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Dialogue international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 giammai 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.

Addirittura. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ in den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” con F

W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).

P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung durante der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato in: Allo stesso modo, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, addirittura. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).

References

The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant sicuro document the direction(s) in which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) con the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published in the most recent elenco of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).

Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up to the reader puro discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on a par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “sicuro expound the meaning of [something]; esatto render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; to elucidate; preciso explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).

Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made per wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning esatto a commentary on verso collection of poetry.

For per theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism per the age of the electronic mass media,” in: G. W. Most (anche.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).

Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Anche. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), preciso name but verso few.

W., at 283–284, gives a list of the most important editions and commentaries, to which one might want onesto add Verso. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis anche Bellico: il passo del libro V, Scaffale di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is verso valuable supplement esatto P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. https://datingranking.net/it/loveagain-review/ Damschen and A. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late to be included con W.’s bibliography.

The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant sicuro be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography con Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late to be included in W.’s bibliography 401–490.

For a useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (e.),Toto notus per orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.